Automation index
How much of a Tennis coach’s job can AI already do?
A stroke pattern comes earlier. Getting them on court without wrecking the shoulder do not.
This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.
Task comparison
IS WORK OVER?
Tennis coach
19%
AI can already do 19% of this job.
#505 / 643
View rankingTennis coach
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Pattern, rally and the plan.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 32% | +5.1 |
Court, the one who hides and the one who overhits.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 22% | 8% | +1.8 |
Competition, the needle and the one who throws the racquet.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Shoulder, load and not rushing the event.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
Parents, the ranking and not burning the child.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 18% | +2.9 |
On court, and the shoulder whole.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 14% | 12% | +1.7 |
| Total | 100% | 19% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- rally
- stroke patterns
- court
- shoulder
- ranking
- racquet
- parents
- training load
Sources for this job· O*NET 27-2022.00· ESCO/ISCO 3422
IS WORK OVER?
NGO programme officer
26%
#218 / 643
View rankingNGO programme officer
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Design, indicators and the report.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 48% | +7.7 |
Justify, invoices and the donor.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 36% | +5.8 |
Field or neighbourhood and what does not fit the frame.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 16% | +2.9 |
Partners, meetings and coordination.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
The surprise, the cut and redoing the timetable.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 18% | +3.2 |
That it works, and not inflating the indicator.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 14% | +2.2 |
| Total | 100% | 26% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- design projects
- justify to donors
- indicators
- activity report
- coordinate partners
- timetable
- project invoices
- neighbourhood work
Sources for this job· O*NET 21-1093.00· ESCO/ISCO 2635