Automation index
How much of a Tennis coach’s job can AI already do?
A stroke pattern comes earlier. Getting them on court without wrecking the shoulder do not.
This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.
Task comparison
IS WORK OVER?
Tennis coach
19%
AI can already do 19% of this job.
#495 / 633
View rankingTennis coach
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Pattern, rally and the plan.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 32% | +5.1 |
Court, the one who hides and the one who overhits.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 22% | 8% | +1.8 |
Competition, the needle and the one who throws the racquet.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Shoulder, load and not rushing the event.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
Parents, the ranking and not burning the child.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 18% | +2.9 |
On court, and the shoulder whole.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 14% | 12% | +1.7 |
| Total | 100% | 19% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- rally
- stroke patterns
- court
- shoulder
- ranking
- racquet
- parents
- training load
Sources for this job· O*NET 27-2022.00· ESCO/ISCO 3422
IS WORK OVER?
Structural engineer
26%
#204 / 633
View rankingStructural engineer
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Model, combinations and the calculation annex.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 52% | +9.4 |
Site, rebar and what was not poured that way.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Code, building regs and the sizing note.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 36% | +5.8 |
Pathology, the crack and shore or not.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 18% | +2.9 |
The architect, the deadline and not trimming the depth.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
Sign that it stands, and not hiding the assumption.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 26% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- calculate structures
- frame model
- calculation annex
- building regs
- rebar
- structural pathology
- load combinations
- shore
Sources for this job· O*NET 17-2051.00· ESCO/ISCO 2142