Automation index
How much of a Ticket inspector’s job can AI already do?
A validator comes earlier. Walking the train and dealing with no ticket do not.
This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.
Task comparison
IS WORK OVER?
Ticket inspector
22%
AI can already do 22% of this job.
#391 / 653
View rankingTicket inspector
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Validate, fares and the intervention note.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Aisle, the group and the one who hides.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 12% | +2.2 |
Fines, data and what you can ask.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
Incident, the full train and calling the conductor.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
The insult, keeping calm and not making a scene.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 18% | +3.2 |
Charge fairly, and not skipping a coach.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 22% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- validate tickets
- rail fares
- interventions
- on-train fines
- walk coaches
- call the conductor
- passenger data
- full trains
Sources for this job· O*NET 53-4031.00· ESCO/ISCO 5112
IS WORK OVER?
Clinical research associate
27%
#172 / 653
View rankingClinical research associate
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Protocol, CRF and the monitoring visit.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 48% | +8.6 |
Source, the gap and the one that does not fit.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Adverse event, the deadline and not delaying.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Consent, the signature and the one who did not understand.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
The sponsor, the audit and not dressing the figure.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
Audit, and not leaving a made-up figure.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 27% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- CRF
- monitoring
- adverse events
- informed consent
- source data
- trial audits
- clinical protocols
- site visits
Sources for this job· O*NET 11-9121.00· ESCO/ISCO 2131