Automation index
How much of a Tourist-office officer’s job can AI already do?
A map and a leaflet come earlier. The visitor leaving happy, not lost, do not.
This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.
Task comparison
IS WORK OVER?
Tourist-office officer
27%
AI can already do 27% of this job.
#189 / 643
View rankingTourist-office officer
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Map, diary and the counter.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 48% | +8.6 |
The one with no language, the one who argues and the one with no booking.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Events, capacity and the one that cancels.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Data, survey and not inflating visitors.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
The council, the shops and not only selling the centre.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
Happy, and not lost.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 27% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- tourist counter
- maps
- events diary
- capacity
- surveys
- bookings
- visitors
- the council
Sources for this job· O*NET 41-3041.00· ESCO/ISCO 4221
IS WORK OVER?
Dosimetrist
22%
#336 / 643
View rankingDosimetrist
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
CT, contours and the plan.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Organ at risk, the curve and not overshooting.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
Physics, the check and the one that does not fit.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
Fraction, the setup and the patient who is not the same.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
The oncologist, the trade-off and not signing blind.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 18% | +3.2 |
The tumour gets it, and the healthy organ does not.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 22% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- dose plans
- contours
- organs at risk
- dosimetry check
- fractions
- setup
- sim CT
- DVH curves
Sources for this job· O*NET 29-2036.00· ESCO/ISCO 3211