Automation index
How much of a Tourist-office officer’s job can AI already do?
A map and a leaflet come earlier. The visitor leaving happy, not lost, do not.
This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.
Task comparison
IS WORK OVER?
Tourist-office officer
27%
AI can already do 27% of this job.
#184 / 633
View rankingTourist-office officer
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Map, diary and the counter.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 48% | +8.6 |
The one with no language, the one who argues and the one with no booking.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Events, capacity and the one that cancels.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Data, survey and not inflating visitors.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
The council, the shops and not only selling the centre.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
Happy, and not lost.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 27% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- tourist counter
- maps
- events diary
- capacity
- surveys
- bookings
- visitors
- the council
Sources for this job· O*NET 41-3041.00· ESCO/ISCO 4221
IS WORK OVER?
Epidemiologist
31%
#34 / 633
View rankingEpidemiologist
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Surveillance, rates and the outbreak on the map.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 52% | +9.4 |
Studies, bias and the report for public health.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 48% | +7.7 |
Surveys, contacts and the case interview.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
Committee, the unpopular measure and the press.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 18% | +3.2 |
Field, the care-home outbreak and dirty data.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Judgement, uncertainty and signing the alert.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 14% | +2.2 |
| Total | 100% | 31% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- watch outbreaks
- compute rates
- epi studies
- case interviews
- map epidemics
- public-health measures
- contact tracing
- health alerts
Sources for this job· O*NET 19-1041.00· ESCO/ISCO 2263