Automation index

How much of a Trader’s job can AI already do?

An order book comes earlier. Executing without blowing the price do not.

This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.

Task comparison

IS WORK OVER?

27%

AI can already do 27% of this job.

#200 / 673

Trader

Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.

The time saving for each task is estimated separately.

Task	Share	AI	Points
Book, liquidity and the ticket. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	18%	48%	+8.6
Execute, slippage and the one who panics. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	16%	40%	+6.4
Limits, risk and not blowing them. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	16%	22%	+3.5
Close, P&L and not hiding the loss. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	16%	28%	+4.5
The rumour, the news and not chasing. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	18%	14%	+2.5
Execute clean, and not blowing the price. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	16%	12%	+1.9
Total	100%		27%

Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low

IS WORK OVER?

22%

#394 / 673

Art teacher

Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.

The time saving for each task is estimated separately.

Task	Share	AI	Points
Project, the sheet and the kit. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	16%	40%	+6.4
Classroom, the one who will not dare and the one who bins it. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	18%	14%	+2.5
Technique, the mistake and not doing it for them. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	16%	28%	+4.5
Show, the corridor and not hanging only the pretty. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	16%	22%	+3.5
Staff, 'it's a soft subject', and not dropping the bar. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	18%	18%	+3.2
That they get dirty, and not copying the model. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	16%	12%	+1.9
Total	100%		22%

Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low