Automation index

How much of a Trader’s job can AI already do?

An order book comes earlier. Executing without blowing the price do not.

This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.

Task comparison

IS WORK OVER?

27%

AI can already do 27% of this job.

#190 / 623

Trader

Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.

The time saving for each task is estimated separately.

Task	Share	AI	Points
Book, liquidity and the ticket. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	18%	48%	+8.6
Execute, slippage and the one who panics. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	16%	40%	+6.4
Limits, risk and not blowing them. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	16%	22%	+3.5
Close, P&L and not hiding the loss. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	16%	28%	+4.5
The rumour, the news and not chasing. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	18%	14%	+2.5
Execute clean, and not blowing the price. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	16%	12%	+1.9
Total	100%		27%

Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low

IS WORK OVER?

27%

#162 / 623

Materials engineer

Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.

The time saving for each task is estimated separately.

Task	Share	AI	Points
Tests, metallography and the spec. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	18%	48%	+8.6
Shop, heat treatment and the part that fails spec. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	16%	22%	+3.5
Material choice, corrosion and fatigue. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	16%	36%	+5.8
Supplier, certificates and the doubtful batch. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	16%	28%	+4.5
The field failure and the root cause. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	18%	14%	+2.5
That it does not fail, and not swapping the material blind. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	16%	12%	+1.9
Total	100%		27%

Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low