Automation index
How much of a Train conductor’s job can AI already do?
A consist sheet comes earlier. Running the train without leaving a passenger at the halt do not.
This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.
Task comparison
IS WORK OVER?
Train conductor
21%
AI can already do 21% of this job.
#440 / 653
View rankingTrain conductor
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Consist, brakes and the departure sheet.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 36% | +5.8 |
Platform, close-up and the one left outside.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 12% | +2.2 |
Incidents, Control and the delay.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
Ticket staff, the fare dodger and the clash.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
The line, the points and not leaving early.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 18% | +3.2 |
Leave nobody behind, and sign the consist.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 21% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- train consist
- platform close-up
- departure sheet
- Control
- brake check
- line incidents
- halts
- delays
Sources for this job· O*NET 53-4031.00· ESCO/ISCO 8312
IS WORK OVER?
Dosimetrist
22%
#338 / 653
View rankingDosimetrist
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
CT, contours and the plan.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Organ at risk, the curve and not overshooting.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
Physics, the check and the one that does not fit.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
Fraction, the setup and the patient who is not the same.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
The oncologist, the trade-off and not signing blind.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 18% | +3.2 |
The tumour gets it, and the healthy organ does not.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 22% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- dose plans
- contours
- organs at risk
- dosimetry check
- fractions
- setup
- sim CT
- DVH curves
Sources for this job· O*NET 29-2036.00· ESCO/ISCO 3211