Automation index
How much of a Treasurer’s job can AI already do?
A cash forecast comes earlier. Having liquidity on Friday without lying to the bank do not.
This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.
Task comparison
IS WORK OVER?
Treasurer
27%
AI can already do 27% of this job.
#189 / 623
View rankingTreasurer
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Cash, forecast and the maturities.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 48% | +8.6 |
Banks, facilities and the one that does not land.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Payments, the supplier and the one that waits.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Board, the report and not dressing cash.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
The crunch, confirming and not hiding the hole.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
Liquidity on Friday, and not lying to the bank.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 27% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- cash forecast
- maturities
- facilities
- supplier payments
- confirming
- liquidity
- banks
- board report
Sources for this job· O*NET 11-3031.00· ESCO/ISCO 1211
IS WORK OVER?
Agile coach
24%
#257 / 623
View rankingAgile coach
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Boards, metrics and the cadence design.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
The real retro and the elephant in the room.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
Train, unblock and the manager who will not let go.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 32% | +5.1 |
Scale, dependencies and fake agile.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
Conflict, power and not selling extra frameworks.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 18% | +3.2 |
That they stop faking it, and not inflating velocity.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 14% | +2.2 |
| Total | 100% | 24% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- retros
- agile cadence
- unblock teams
- flow metrics
- fake agile
- agile training
- dependencies
- velocity
Sources for this job· O*NET 13-1111.00· ESCO/ISCO 2421