Automation index
How much of a Treasurer’s job can AI already do?
A cash forecast comes earlier. Having liquidity on Friday without lying to the bank do not.
This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.
Task comparison
IS WORK OVER?
Treasurer
27%
AI can already do 27% of this job.
#222 / 733
View rankingTreasurer
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Cash, forecast and the maturities.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 48% | +8.6 |
Banks, facilities and the one that does not land.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Payments, the supplier and the one that waits.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Board, the report and not dressing cash.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
The crunch, confirming and not hiding the hole.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
Liquidity on Friday, and not lying to the bank.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 27% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- cash forecast
- maturities
- facilities
- supplier payments
- confirming
- liquidity
- banks
- board report
Sources for this job· O*NET 11-3031.00· ESCO/ISCO 1211
IS WORK OVER?
Reliability engineer
27%
#175 / 733
View rankingReliability engineer
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Data, MTBF and the Pareto.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 48% | +8.6 |
Failure, the cause and not patching twice.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Spare, the critical and not hiding it.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
RCM, the plan and the one that is not done.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
Production, the rush and not running the tired one.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
That it does not drop at three, and not hiding the spare.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 27% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- MTBF
- Pareto
- root causes
- critical spares
- RCM
- failures
- maintenance plans
- not patch twice
Sources for this job· O*NET 17-2112.00· ESCO/ISCO 2141