Automation index
How much of a Treasurer’s job can AI already do?
A cash forecast comes earlier. Having liquidity on Friday without lying to the bank do not.
This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.
Task comparison
IS WORK OVER?
Treasurer
27%
AI can already do 27% of this job.
#189 / 623
View rankingTreasurer
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Cash, forecast and the maturities.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 48% | +8.6 |
Banks, facilities and the one that does not land.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Payments, the supplier and the one that waits.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Board, the report and not dressing cash.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
The crunch, confirming and not hiding the hole.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
Liquidity on Friday, and not lying to the bank.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 27% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- cash forecast
- maturities
- facilities
- supplier payments
- confirming
- liquidity
- banks
- board report
Sources for this job· O*NET 11-3031.00· ESCO/ISCO 1211
IS WORK OVER?
Structural engineer
26%
#204 / 623
View rankingStructural engineer
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Model, combinations and the calculation annex.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 52% | +9.4 |
Site, rebar and what was not poured that way.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Code, building regs and the sizing note.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 36% | +5.8 |
Pathology, the crack and shore or not.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 18% | +2.9 |
The architect, the deadline and not trimming the depth.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
Sign that it stands, and not hiding the assumption.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 26% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- calculate structures
- frame model
- calculation annex
- building regs
- rebar
- structural pathology
- load combinations
- shore
Sources for this job· O*NET 17-2051.00· ESCO/ISCO 2142