Automation index
How much of a UX writer’s job can AI already do?
A microcopy draft comes earlier. Being understood first time without sounding like a robot do not.
This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.
Task comparison
IS WORK OVER?
UX writer
28%
AI can already do 28% of this job.
#125 / 623
View rankingUX writer
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Microcopy, errors and the UI tone.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 52% | +9.4 |
Glossary, consistency and i18n strings.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
User tests and the button nobody taps.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Legal, the disclaimer and not scaring people.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
Design, product and the extra word.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
That it is understood, and not sounding like an ad.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 28% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- microcopy
- UI tone
- error messages
- UX glossary
- i18n
- comprehension tests
- disclaimers
- UI strings
Sources for this job· O*NET 27-3043.00· ESCO/ISCO 2641
IS WORK OVER?
Microbiologist
22%
#354 / 623
View rankingMicrobiologist
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Protocols, plates and a first result.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Plate, incubate and read cultures.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 20% | 12% | +2.4 |
Report to the clinician and not jump.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Quality, strains and documentation.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
Biosafety, waste and kit.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 16% | +2.6 |
Not calling a negative that is a positive.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 14% | +2.2 |
| Total | 100% | 22% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- Protocols, plates and a first result
- Plate, incubate and read cultures
- Report to the clinician and not jump
- Quality, strains and documentation
- Biosafety, waste and kit
- Not calling a negative that is a positive
- microbiologo
Sources for this job· O*NET 19-1022.00· ESCO/ISCO 2131