Automation index
How much of a UX writer’s job can AI already do?
A microcopy draft comes earlier. Being understood first time without sounding like a robot do not.
This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.
Task comparison
IS WORK OVER?
UX writer
28%
AI can already do 28% of this job.
#125 / 633
View rankingUX writer
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Microcopy, errors and the UI tone.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 52% | +9.4 |
Glossary, consistency and i18n strings.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
User tests and the button nobody taps.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Legal, the disclaimer and not scaring people.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
Design, product and the extra word.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
That it is understood, and not sounding like an ad.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 28% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- microcopy
- UI tone
- error messages
- UX glossary
- i18n
- comprehension tests
- disclaimers
- UI strings
Sources for this job· O*NET 27-3043.00· ESCO/ISCO 2641
IS WORK OVER?
Talent scout
27%
#170 / 633
View rankingTalent scout
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Match, notes and the report.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 48% | +8.6 |
See them live, the setting and the one who hides.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Data, GPS and not trusting the clip alone.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Network, agents and the one already promised.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
The club, the rush and not inflating the average.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
See the player, and not falling for the goal.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 27% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- scout reports
- see live
- player GPS
- agents
- scout network
- data
- clips
- the player’s setting
Sources for this job· O*NET 27-2022.00· ESCO/ISCO 3422