Automation index
How much of a Valet’s job can AI already do?
A key tag comes earlier. Not marking the car and having it ready when they come out do not.
This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.
Task comparison
IS WORK OVER?
Valet
19%
AI can already do 19% of this job.
#566 / 653
View rankingValet
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Tag, keys and the bay map.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 32% | +5.1 |
Drive someone else’s, the tight car park and not marking it.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 22% | 8% | +1.8 |
The client already out and the car still downstairs.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Insurance, the knock and who pays.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
The event, the rain and not losing a key.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 18% | +2.9 |
No mark, and the car on time.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 14% | 12% | +1.7 |
| Total | 100% | 19% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- keep keys
- park others’ cars
- bay map
- not mark
- valet events
- knock insurance
- tight car park
- return on time
Sources for this job· O*NET 53-6021.00· ESCO/ISCO 8322
IS WORK OVER?
Dosimetrist
22%
#338 / 653
View rankingDosimetrist
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
CT, contours and the plan.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Organ at risk, the curve and not overshooting.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
Physics, the check and the one that does not fit.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
Fraction, the setup and the patient who is not the same.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
The oncologist, the trade-off and not signing blind.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 18% | +3.2 |
The tumour gets it, and the healthy organ does not.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 22% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- dose plans
- contours
- organs at risk
- dosimetry check
- fractions
- setup
- sim CT
- DVH curves
Sources for this job· O*NET 29-2036.00· ESCO/ISCO 3211