Automation index
How much of a Varnisher’s job can AI already do?
A colour card comes earlier. A finish that does not show the grain the wrong way does not.
This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.
Task comparison
IS WORK OVER?
Varnisher
18%
AI can already do 18% of this job.
#573 / 653
View rankingVarnisher
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Colour cards, ranges and orders.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 32% | +5.1 |
Sand, stain, apply and dry.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 22% | 10% | +2.2 |
Booth, filters and dust.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 14% | +2.2 |
Cabinetmaker, deadlines and touch-up.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Repairs in the home and on site.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 18% | +2.9 |
Not delivering a piece with orange peel.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 14% | 14% | +2 |
| Total | 100% | 18% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- Colour cards, ranges and orders
- Sand, stain, apply and dry
- Booth, filters and dust
- Cabinetmaker, deadlines and touch-up
- Repairs in the home and on site
- Not delivering a piece with orange peel
- barnizador
- lacador
- varnisher
Sources for this job· O*NET 51-9123.00· ESCO/ISCO 7522
IS WORK OVER?
Clinical research associate
27%
#172 / 653
View rankingClinical research associate
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Protocol, CRF and the monitoring visit.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 48% | +8.6 |
Source, the gap and the one that does not fit.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Adverse event, the deadline and not delaying.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Consent, the signature and the one who did not understand.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
The sponsor, the audit and not dressing the figure.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
Audit, and not leaving a made-up figure.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 27% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- CRF
- monitoring
- adverse events
- informed consent
- source data
- trial audits
- clinical protocols
- site visits
Sources for this job· O*NET 11-9121.00· ESCO/ISCO 2131