Automation index
How much of a Vocational teacher’s job can AI already do?
A syllabus and a test come earlier. Running a workshop until the student welds straight does not.
This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.
Task comparison
IS WORK OVER?
Vocational teacher
22%
AI can already do 22% of this job.
#377 / 643
View rankingVocational teacher
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Plan modules, rubrics and exams.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Workshop, practice and safety watch.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 22% | 12% | +2.6 |
Tutor placements, firms and difficult students.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Assess, minutes and vocational cycles.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
Staff meeting, coordination and workshop stock.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 18% | +2.9 |
Not leaving anyone without a trade or a diploma.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 14% | 14% | +2 |
| Total | 100% | 22% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- teach class
- mark students
- lesson plans
- teach
- Plan modules, rubrics and exams
- Workshop, practice and safety watch
- Assess, minutes and vocational cycles
- profesor de fp
- vocational teacher
Sources for this job· O*NET 25-2032.00· ESCO/ISCO 2320
IS WORK OVER?
Research scientist
27%
#139 / 643
View rankingResearch scientist
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Literature review, figures and drafts.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 22% | 48% | +10.6 |
Analysis, code and experiment boards.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 42% | +7.6 |
Design the study and the controls.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 18% | +2.9 |
Run the experiment or the fieldwork.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
Lead a group, theses and authorship fights.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 14% | 15% | +2.1 |
Win funding and answer reviewers.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 14% | 16% | +2.2 |
| Total | 100% | 27% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- Literature review, figures and drafts
- Analysis, code and experiment boards
- Design the study and the controls
- Run the experiment or the fieldwork
- Lead a group, theses and authorship fights
- Win funding and answer reviewers
- cientifico
- investigador
- research scientist
Sources for this job· O*NET 19-1029.00· ESCO/ISCO 2131