Automation index
How much of a Volunteer coordinator’s job can AI already do?
A spreadsheet rota comes earlier. Getting them to come, stay, and do no harm, do not.
This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.
Task comparison
IS WORK OVER?
Volunteer coordinator
25%
AI can already do 25% of this job.
#223 / 643
View rankingVolunteer coordinator
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Recruitment, rotas and the volunteer register.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 44% | +7 |
Train, support and the one who arrives lost.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 16% | +2.9 |
Insurance, agreements and the volunteering act.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 32% | +5.1 |
Recognise, keep them and the one who burns out.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
The clash between volunteer and staff.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 18% | +3.2 |
That they add, and do not replace paid work.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 14% | +2.2 |
| Total | 100% | 25% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- recruit volunteers
- make rotas
- train volunteers
- volunteering law
- retain volunteers
- volunteer insurance
- staff conflict
- volunteer register
Sources for this job· O*NET 11-9151.00· ESCO/ISCO 1344
IS WORK OVER?
Clinical research associate
27%
#172 / 643
View rankingClinical research associate
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Protocol, CRF and the monitoring visit.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 48% | +8.6 |
Source, the gap and the one that does not fit.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Adverse event, the deadline and not delaying.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Consent, the signature and the one who did not understand.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
The sponsor, the audit and not dressing the figure.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
Audit, and not leaving a made-up figure.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 27% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- CRF
- monitoring
- adverse events
- informed consent
- source data
- trial audits
- clinical protocols
- site visits
Sources for this job· O*NET 11-9121.00· ESCO/ISCO 2131