Automation index
How much of a Volunteer coordinator’s job can AI already do?
A spreadsheet rota comes earlier. Getting them to come, stay, and do no harm, do not.
This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.
Task comparison
IS WORK OVER?
Volunteer coordinator
25%
AI can already do 25% of this job.
#218 / 623
View rankingVolunteer coordinator
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Recruitment, rotas and the volunteer register.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 44% | +7 |
Train, support and the one who arrives lost.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 16% | +2.9 |
Insurance, agreements and the volunteering act.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 32% | +5.1 |
Recognise, keep them and the one who burns out.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
The clash between volunteer and staff.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 18% | +3.2 |
That they add, and do not replace paid work.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 14% | +2.2 |
| Total | 100% | 25% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- recruit volunteers
- make rotas
- train volunteers
- volunteering law
- retain volunteers
- volunteer insurance
- staff conflict
- volunteer register
Sources for this job· O*NET 11-9151.00· ESCO/ISCO 1344
IS WORK OVER?
Copy editor
31%
#32 / 623
View rankingCopy editor
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Spelling, agreement and consistency.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 52% | +9.4 |
Style, repetition and sentence rhythm.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 48% | +7.7 |
Queries to the author, grey areas and the house style.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
Second proofs, PDF and last-minute typos.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 22% | +4 |
Deadlines with publisher, layout and translation.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 18% | +2.9 |
Judgement, not over-rewriting, and the typo that remains.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 14% | +2.2 |
| Total | 100% | 31% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- copy-edit
- spelling and punctuation
- unify style
- catch typos
- house style
- second proofs
- author queries
- avoid over-editing
Sources for this job· O*NET 27-3041.00· ESCO/ISCO 2641