Automation index
How much of a Wall tiler’s job can AI already do?
A joint set-out comes earlier. No ugly cut and holding the water do not.
This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.
Task comparison
IS WORK OVER?
Wall tiler
19%
AI can already do 19% of this job.
#490 / 653
View rankingWall tiler
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Set-out, level and the tile format.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 32% | +5.1 |
Adhesive, set and the tray fall.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 22% | 8% | +1.8 |
Cut, drill and the tile that splits.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Grout, seal and the bath junction.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
The client, the model change and the stock that is late.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 18% | +2.9 |
No ugly cut, and no leak.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 14% | 12% | +1.7 |
| Total | 100% | 19% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- tile walls
- set out joints
- bed tiles
- tray fall
- seal junctions
- cut tiles
- drill tile
- grout
Sources for this job· O*NET 47-2044.00· ESCO/ISCO 7122
IS WORK OVER?
Clinical research associate
27%
#172 / 653
View rankingClinical research associate
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Protocol, CRF and the monitoring visit.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 48% | +8.6 |
Source, the gap and the one that does not fit.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Adverse event, the deadline and not delaying.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Consent, the signature and the one who did not understand.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
The sponsor, the audit and not dressing the figure.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
Audit, and not leaving a made-up figure.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 27% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- CRF
- monitoring
- adverse events
- informed consent
- source data
- trial audits
- clinical protocols
- site visits
Sources for this job· O*NET 11-9121.00· ESCO/ISCO 2131