Automation index
How much of a Warehouse supervisor’s job can AI already do?
A dock dashboard comes earlier. Getting the shift out without mixing the goods do not.
This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.
Task comparison
IS WORK OVER?
Warehouse supervisor
24%
AI can already do 24% of this job.
#304 / 733
View rankingWarehouse supervisor
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Docks, waves and the shift plan.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
The team, the peak and the one who cannot keep up.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
Stock, shrink and the mystery gap.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 32% | +5.1 |
Safety, forklifts and the near miss.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
The late haulier and not mixing the docks.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 18% | +3.2 |
Get the shift out, and not mixing the goods.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 14% | +2.2 |
| Total | 100% | 24% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- plan docks
- waves
- warehouse shift
- shrink
- forklifts
- near misses
- outbound peaks
- mixed goods
Sources for this job· O*NET 53-1048.00· ESCO/ISCO 1324
IS WORK OVER?
Reliability engineer
27%
#175 / 733
View rankingReliability engineer
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Data, MTBF and the Pareto.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 48% | +8.6 |
Failure, the cause and not patching twice.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Spare, the critical and not hiding it.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
RCM, the plan and the one that is not done.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
Production, the rush and not running the tired one.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
That it does not drop at three, and not hiding the spare.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 27% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- MTBF
- Pareto
- root causes
- critical spares
- RCM
- failures
- maintenance plans
- not patch twice
Sources for this job· O*NET 17-2112.00· ESCO/ISCO 2141