Automation index
How much of a Waterproofer’s job can AI already do?
A junction detail comes earlier. No leak at the parapet joint do not.
This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.
Task comparison
IS WORK OVER?
Waterproofer
21%
AI can already do 21% of this job.
#433 / 643
View rankingWaterproofer
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Substrate, fall and primer.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 32% | +5.1 |
Membrane, weld and the parapet junction.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 12% | +2.2 |
Flood test and the leak that shows.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Details, outlets and pipe penetrations.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 32% | +5.1 |
The roof, the wind and not flying a sheet.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 18% | +3.2 |
No leak, and not skimping the overlap.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 21% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- weld membranes
- parapet junctions
- flood test
- outlets
- primer
- pipe penetrations
- roof falls
- laps
Sources for this job· O*NET 47-2181.00· ESCO/ISCO 7121
IS WORK OVER?
QA tester
38%
#11 / 643
View rankingQA tester
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Identify, analyze, and document problems with program function, output, online screen, or content.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 12% | 55% | +6.6 |
Document software defects, using a bug tracking system, and report defects to software developers.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 11% | 55% | +6.1 |
Install, maintain, or use software testing programs.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 8% | 28% | +2.2 |
Monitor program performance to ensure efficient and problem-free operations.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 6% | 28% | +1.7 |
Develop testing programs that address areas such as database impacts, software scenarios, regression testing, negative testing, error or bug retests, or usability.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 6% | 48% | +2.9 |
Document test procedures to ensure replicability and compliance with standards.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 6% | 55% | +3.3 |
Create or maintain databases of known test defects.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 6% | 48% | +2.9 |
Provide feedback and recommendations to developers on software usability and functionality.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 6% | 28% | +1.7 |
Other less frequent tasks (weight estimated from frequency).EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 39% | 28% | +10.9 |
| Total | 100% | 38% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- internal risk management policy
- ICT quality policy
- software anomalies
- levels of software testing
- quality standards
- quality assurance methodologies
- ICT process quality models
- set quality assurance objectives
- ensure continuous preparedness for audits
- comply with legal regulations
Sources for this job· O*NET 15-1253.00· ESCO/ISCO 2519