Automation index
How much of a Waterproofer’s job can AI already do?
A junction detail comes earlier. No leak at the parapet joint do not.
This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.
Task comparison
IS WORK OVER?
Waterproofer
21%
AI can already do 21% of this job.
#512 / 743
View rankingWaterproofer
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Substrate, fall and primer.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 32% | +5.1 |
Membrane, weld and the parapet junction.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 12% | +2.2 |
Flood test and the leak that shows.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Details, outlets and pipe penetrations.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 32% | +5.1 |
The roof, the wind and not flying a sheet.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 18% | +3.2 |
No leak, and not skimping the overlap.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 21% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- weld membranes
- parapet junctions
- flood test
- outlets
- primer
- pipe penetrations
- roof falls
- laps
Sources for this job· O*NET 47-2181.00· ESCO/ISCO 7121
IS WORK OVER?
Site engineer
19%
#598 / 743
View rankingSite engineer
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Setting-out, axes and the level.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 32% | +5.1 |
Rebar, cover and the one that is missing.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 22% | 8% | +1.8 |
Concrete, the slump and not pouring if it fails.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Note, the diary and not dressing the delay.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
The site manager, the rush and not covering bad steel.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 18% | +2.9 |
That the column is there, and not covering the steel.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 14% | 12% | +1.7 |
| Total | 100% | 19% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- setting-out
- axes
- rebar
- cover
- slump
- site diary
- levels
- not cover steel
Sources for this job· O*NET 17-2051.00· ESCO/ISCO 2142