Automation index
How much of a Wealth manager’s job can AI already do?
A model book comes earlier. Sitting with the client without selling them the house product do not.
This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.
Task comparison
IS WORK OVER?
Wealth manager
27%
AI can already do 27% of this job.
#157 / 643
View rankingWealth manager
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Profile, IPS and the book.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 48% | +8.6 |
Meeting, the fear and the one who wants it all on deposit.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Tax, succession and not leaving a hole.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Report, the market and not dressing the year.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
The committee, the product and not pushing the house book.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
Sit for real, and not selling the house product.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 27% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- IPS
- wealth books
- succession
- wealth tax
- risk profiles
- client reports
- house products
- deposits
Sources for this job· O*NET 13-2052.00· ESCO/ISCO 2412
IS WORK OVER?
Clinical research associate
27%
#172 / 643
View rankingClinical research associate
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Protocol, CRF and the monitoring visit.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 48% | +8.6 |
Source, the gap and the one that does not fit.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Adverse event, the deadline and not delaying.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Consent, the signature and the one who did not understand.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
The sponsor, the audit and not dressing the figure.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
Audit, and not leaving a made-up figure.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 27% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- CRF
- monitoring
- adverse events
- informed consent
- source data
- trial audits
- clinical protocols
- site visits
Sources for this job· O*NET 11-9121.00· ESCO/ISCO 2131