Automation index
How much of a Wealth manager’s job can AI already do?
A model book comes earlier. Sitting with the client without selling them the house product do not.
This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.
Task comparison
IS WORK OVER?
Wealth manager
27%
AI can already do 27% of this job.
#157 / 643
View rankingWealth manager
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Profile, IPS and the book.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 48% | +8.6 |
Meeting, the fear and the one who wants it all on deposit.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Tax, succession and not leaving a hole.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Report, the market and not dressing the year.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
The committee, the product and not pushing the house book.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
Sit for real, and not selling the house product.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 27% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- IPS
- wealth books
- succession
- wealth tax
- risk profiles
- client reports
- house products
- deposits
Sources for this job· O*NET 13-2052.00· ESCO/ISCO 2412
IS WORK OVER?
Pharmacovigilance officer
27%
#186 / 643
View rankingPharmacovigilance officer
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Case, the file and MedDRA.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 48% | +8.6 |
Seriousness, the link and the one that does not fit.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
File, the AEMPS deadline and not delaying.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Signal, the aggregate and not playing it down.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
The doctor, the ADR and not arguing the story.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
If it is serious, call it. And not staying quiet.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 27% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- ADR
- MedDRA
- AEMPS
- safety signals
- seriousness
- causality
- case files
- regulatory deadlines
Sources for this job· O*NET 29-1051.00· ESCO/ISCO 2262