Automation index
How much of a Wealth manager’s job can AI already do?
A model book comes earlier. Sitting with the client without selling them the house product do not.
This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.
Task comparison
IS WORK OVER?
Wealth manager
27%
AI can already do 27% of this job.
#167 / 733
View rankingWealth manager
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Profile, IPS and the book.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 48% | +8.6 |
Meeting, the fear and the one who wants it all on deposit.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Tax, succession and not leaving a hole.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Report, the market and not dressing the year.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
The committee, the product and not pushing the house book.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
Sit for real, and not selling the house product.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 27% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- IPS
- wealth books
- succession
- wealth tax
- risk profiles
- client reports
- house products
- deposits
Sources for this job· O*NET 13-2052.00· ESCO/ISCO 2412
IS WORK OVER?
Reliability engineer
27%
#175 / 733
View rankingReliability engineer
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Data, MTBF and the Pareto.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 48% | +8.6 |
Failure, the cause and not patching twice.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Spare, the critical and not hiding it.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
RCM, the plan and the one that is not done.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
Production, the rush and not running the tired one.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
That it does not drop at three, and not hiding the spare.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 27% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- MTBF
- Pareto
- root causes
- critical spares
- RCM
- failures
- maintenance plans
- not patch twice
Sources for this job· O*NET 17-2112.00· ESCO/ISCO 2141