Automation index
How much of a Wealth manager’s job can AI already do?
A model book comes earlier. Sitting with the client without selling them the house product do not.
This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.
Task comparison
IS WORK OVER?
Wealth manager
27%
AI can already do 27% of this job.
#156 / 623
View rankingWealth manager
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Profile, IPS and the book.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 48% | +8.6 |
Meeting, the fear and the one who wants it all on deposit.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Tax, succession and not leaving a hole.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Report, the market and not dressing the year.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
The committee, the product and not pushing the house book.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
Sit for real, and not selling the house product.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 27% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- IPS
- wealth books
- succession
- wealth tax
- risk profiles
- client reports
- house products
- deposits
Sources for this job· O*NET 13-2052.00· ESCO/ISCO 2412
IS WORK OVER?
Structural engineer
26%
#204 / 623
View rankingStructural engineer
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Model, combinations and the calculation annex.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 52% | +9.4 |
Site, rebar and what was not poured that way.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Code, building regs and the sizing note.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 36% | +5.8 |
Pathology, the crack and shore or not.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 18% | +2.9 |
The architect, the deadline and not trimming the depth.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
Sign that it stands, and not hiding the assumption.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 26% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- calculate structures
- frame model
- calculation annex
- building regs
- rebar
- structural pathology
- load combinations
- shore
Sources for this job· O*NET 17-2051.00· ESCO/ISCO 2142