Automation index
How much of a Welding inspector’s job can AI already do?
A WPS comes earlier. Accepting the bead without signing the pore do not.
This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.
Task comparison
IS WORK OVER?
Welding inspector
22%
AI can already do 22% of this job.
#426 / 773
View rankingWelding inspector
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
WPS, qualification and the bead.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Visual, the pore and the one that hides.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
NDT, the report and not contradicting.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
Site, the access and the welder who rushes.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
The deadline, the pressure and not signing the pore.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 18% | +3.2 |
Accept the sound bead.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 22% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- WPS
- beads
- pores
- welder qualification
- weld NDT
- site
- access
- inspection reports
Sources for this job· O*NET 51-9061.00· ESCO/ISCO 3119
IS WORK OVER?
Front-end developer
27%
#157 / 773
View rankingFront-end developer
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Component, states and the design.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 48% | +8.6 |
Accessible, the keyboard and the reader.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Contrast, the token and not leaving it dead.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Performance, the weight and not adding the extra library.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
The designer, the pixel and not fighting for sport.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
That it works from the keyboard, and not leaving the contrast.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 27% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- components
- accessibility
- keyboard
- contrast
- tokens
- front-end performance
- libraries
- write interface
Sources for this job· O*NET 15-1254.00· ESCO/ISCO 2513