Automation index
How much of a Window installer’s job can AI already do?
A measured opening comes earlier. Closing, insulating and not trapping the lintel do not.
This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.
Task comparison
IS WORK OVER?
Window installer
19%
AI can already do 19% of this job.
#519 / 653
View rankingWindow installer
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Measure openings, subframe and the order.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 32% | +5.1 |
Set, plumb and the missing packer.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 22% | 8% | +1.8 |
Foam, seal and the sweating lintel.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Fittings, adjust and the sash that rubs.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
The lived-in house and not leaving the room freezing.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 18% | +2.9 |
That it closes, and not trapping the lintel.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 14% | 12% | +1.7 |
| Total | 100% | 19% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- measure openings
- subframes
- plumb windows
- seal lintels
- adjust sashes
- foam
- packers
- window fittings
Sources for this job· O*NET 47-2121.00· ESCO/ISCO 7125
IS WORK OVER?
Dosimetrist
22%
#338 / 653
View rankingDosimetrist
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
CT, contours and the plan.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Organ at risk, the curve and not overshooting.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
Physics, the check and the one that does not fit.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
Fraction, the setup and the patient who is not the same.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
The oncologist, the trade-off and not signing blind.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 18% | +3.2 |
The tumour gets it, and the healthy organ does not.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 22% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- dose plans
- contours
- organs at risk
- dosimetry check
- fractions
- setup
- sim CT
- DVH curves
Sources for this job· O*NET 29-2036.00· ESCO/ISCO 3211