Automation index
How much of a Workshop teacher’s job can AI already do?
A practical sheet comes earlier. Making the piece without cutting themselves do not.
This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.
Task comparison
IS WORK OVER?
Workshop teacher
19%
AI can already do 19% of this job.
#526 / 653
View rankingWorkshop teacher
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Sheet, material and the station.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 32% | +5.1 |
Shop, the machine and the one without glasses.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 22% | 8% | +1.8 |
The piece, the error and doing it again.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Assess, the portfolio and not giving the pass away.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
The firm, the placement and the one who does not fit.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 18% | +2.9 |
The piece made, and no cuts.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 14% | 12% | +1.7 |
| Total | 100% | 19% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- practical sheets
- shop machines
- glasses
- portfolio
- firm placements
- shop stations
- shop safety
- pieces
Sources for this job· O*NET 25-2032.00· ESCO/ISCO 2320
IS WORK OVER?
Clinical research associate
27%
#172 / 653
View rankingClinical research associate
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Protocol, CRF and the monitoring visit.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 48% | +8.6 |
Source, the gap and the one that does not fit.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Adverse event, the deadline and not delaying.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Consent, the signature and the one who did not understand.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
The sponsor, the audit and not dressing the figure.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
Audit, and not leaving a made-up figure.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 27% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- CRF
- monitoring
- adverse events
- informed consent
- source data
- trial audits
- clinical protocols
- site visits
Sources for this job· O*NET 11-9121.00· ESCO/ISCO 2131