Automation index
How much of a Workshop teacher’s job can AI already do?
A practical sheet comes earlier. Making the piece without cutting themselves do not.
This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.
Task comparison
IS WORK OVER?
Workshop teacher
19%
AI can already do 19% of this job.
#519 / 643
View rankingWorkshop teacher
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Sheet, material and the station.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 32% | +5.1 |
Shop, the machine and the one without glasses.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 22% | 8% | +1.8 |
The piece, the error and doing it again.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Assess, the portfolio and not giving the pass away.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
The firm, the placement and the one who does not fit.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 18% | +2.9 |
The piece made, and no cuts.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 14% | 12% | +1.7 |
| Total | 100% | 19% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- practical sheets
- shop machines
- glasses
- portfolio
- firm placements
- shop stations
- shop safety
- pieces
Sources for this job· O*NET 25-2032.00· ESCO/ISCO 2320
IS WORK OVER?
NGO programme officer
26%
#218 / 643
View rankingNGO programme officer
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Design, indicators and the report.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 48% | +7.7 |
Justify, invoices and the donor.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 36% | +5.8 |
Field or neighbourhood and what does not fit the frame.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 16% | +2.9 |
Partners, meetings and coordination.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
The surprise, the cut and redoing the timetable.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 18% | +3.2 |
That it works, and not inflating the indicator.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 14% | +2.2 |
| Total | 100% | 26% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- design projects
- justify to donors
- indicators
- activity report
- coordinate partners
- timetable
- project invoices
- neighbourhood work
Sources for this job· O*NET 21-1093.00· ESCO/ISCO 2635