Automation index
How much of a Youth educator’s job can AI already do?
An incident note comes earlier. Being there at night so nobody absconds do not.
This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.
Task comparison
IS WORK OVER?
Youth educator
21%
AI can already do 21% of this job.
#428 / 653
View rankingYouth educator
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Plan, notes and the young person’s file.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 36% | +5.8 |
Shift, holding and the attempted abscond.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 22% | 10% | +2.2 |
Workshop, homework and the hour that is not a fight.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Family, youth prosecution and the judge.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
Street, leisure and the one who is late back.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 18% | +2.9 |
The bond, and not losing the kid.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 14% | 12% | +1.7 |
| Total | 100% | 21% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- educate young people
- residential shifts
- hold incidents
- incident notes
- education workshop
- youth court
- prevent absconding
- night support
Sources for this job· O*NET 21-1093.00· ESCO/ISCO 2635
IS WORK OVER?
Clinical research associate
27%
#172 / 653
View rankingClinical research associate
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Protocol, CRF and the monitoring visit.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 48% | +8.6 |
Source, the gap and the one that does not fit.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Adverse event, the deadline and not delaying.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Consent, the signature and the one who did not understand.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
The sponsor, the audit and not dressing the figure.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
Audit, and not leaving a made-up figure.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 27% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- CRF
- monitoring
- adverse events
- informed consent
- source data
- trial audits
- clinical protocols
- site visits
Sources for this job· O*NET 11-9121.00· ESCO/ISCO 2131