Automation index
How much of a Youth educator’s job can AI already do?
An incident note comes earlier. Being there at night so nobody absconds do not.
This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.
Task comparison
IS WORK OVER?
Youth educator
21%
AI can already do 21% of this job.
#428 / 653
View rankingYouth educator
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Plan, notes and the young person’s file.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 36% | +5.8 |
Shift, holding and the attempted abscond.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 22% | 10% | +2.2 |
Workshop, homework and the hour that is not a fight.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Family, youth prosecution and the judge.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
Street, leisure and the one who is late back.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 18% | +2.9 |
The bond, and not losing the kid.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 14% | 12% | +1.7 |
| Total | 100% | 21% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- educate young people
- residential shifts
- hold incidents
- incident notes
- education workshop
- youth court
- prevent absconding
- night support
Sources for this job· O*NET 21-1093.00· ESCO/ISCO 2635
IS WORK OVER?
Dosimetrist
22%
#338 / 653
View rankingDosimetrist
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
CT, contours and the plan.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Organ at risk, the curve and not overshooting.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
Physics, the check and the one that does not fit.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
Fraction, the setup and the patient who is not the same.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
The oncologist, the trade-off and not signing blind.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 18% | +3.2 |
The tumour gets it, and the healthy organ does not.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 22% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- dose plans
- contours
- organs at risk
- dosimetry check
- fractions
- setup
- sim CT
- DVH curves
Sources for this job· O*NET 29-2036.00· ESCO/ISCO 3211