Automation index

How much of a Youth educator’s job can AI already do?

An incident note comes earlier. Being there at night so nobody absconds do not.

This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.

Task comparison

IS WORK OVER?

21%

AI can already do 21% of this job.

#445 / 673

Youth educator

Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.

The time saving for each task is estimated separately.

Task	Share	AI	Points
Plan, notes and the young person’s file. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	16%	36%	+5.8
Shift, holding and the attempted abscond. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	22%	10%	+2.2
Workshop, homework and the hour that is not a fight. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	16%	22%	+3.5
Family, youth prosecution and the judge. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	16%	28%	+4.5
Street, leisure and the one who is late back. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	16%	18%	+2.9
The bond, and not losing the kid. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	14%	12%	+1.7
Total	100%		21%

Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low

IS WORK OVER?

22%

#391 / 673

Spanish language teacher

Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.

The time saving for each task is estimated separately.

Task	Share	AI	Points
Reading, the commentary and the rubric. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	16%	40%	+6.4
Writing, the paragraph and the one who will not start. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	18%	14%	+2.5
Speaking, the fear and getting them to talk. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	16%	28%	+4.5
Spelling, the mark-up and not humiliating. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	16%	22%	+3.5
Plagiarism, the web and not looking away. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	18%	18%	+3.2
That they write with sense, and not copying. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	16%	12%	+1.9
Total	100%		22%

Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low