Automation index
How much of a Zookeeper’s job can AI already do?
An enclosure protocol comes earlier. Going in, feeding and not losing an animal do not.
This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.
Task comparison
IS WORK OVER?
Zookeeper
19%
AI can already do 19% of this job.
#498 / 643
View rankingZookeeper
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Protocol, ration and the enclosure log.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 32% | +5.1 |
Go in, clean and the one that will not come off.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 22% | 8% | +1.8 |
Enrichment, the public and not teaching badly.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Vet, the sign and calling it in time.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
Escape, the protocol and not improvising.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 18% | +2.9 |
Not losing an animal, and not skipping the lock.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 14% | 12% | +1.7 |
| Total | 100% | 19% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- enclosures
- zoo rations
- enrichment
- escape protocol
- vet log
- lock-up
- enclosure clean
- the public
Sources for this job· O*NET 39-2021.00· ESCO/ISCO 5164
IS WORK OVER?
Blood bank technician
28%
#120 / 643
View rankingBlood bank technician
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Group, screen and the bag crossmatch.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 52% | +9.4 |
Fractionate, label and traceability.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
The emergency, the massive and the ID error.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
Donation, apheresis and the donor who feels unwell.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
Stock, expiry and what theatre asks for.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
The right bag and owning the blood group.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 28% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- crossmatch blood
- blood group
- fractionate products
- donor apheresis
- bag traceability
- massive transfusion
- label units
- blood bank
Sources for this job· O*NET 29-2011.00· ESCO/ISCO 3212