Automation index
How much of a Driving examiner’s job can AI already do?
A route card comes earlier. Calling the pass from the passenger seat do not.
This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.
Task comparison
IS WORK OVER?
Driving examiner
21%
AI can already do 21% of this job.
#505 / 743
View rankingDriving examiner
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Route, card and the day’s draw.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 36% | +5.8 |
The test, the serious fault and the one who panics.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 22% | 10% | +2.2 |
Pass or not, the report and not arguing hot.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
Driving school, the car and the instructor on the kerb.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Rain, traffic and the same standard.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 18% | +2.9 |
A fair pass, and not giving the licence away.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 14% | 12% | +1.7 |
| Total | 100% | 21% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- test routes
- serious faults
- driving pass
- test reports
- one standard
- driving schools
- candidate nerves
- the licence
Sources for this job· O*NET 13-1041.00· ESCO/ISCO 3359
IS WORK OVER?
Reliability engineer
27%
#176 / 743
View rankingReliability engineer
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Data, MTBF and the Pareto.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 48% | +8.6 |
Failure, the cause and not patching twice.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Spare, the critical and not hiding it.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
RCM, the plan and the one that is not done.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
Production, the rush and not running the tired one.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
That it does not drop at three, and not hiding the spare.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 27% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- MTBF
- Pareto
- root causes
- critical spares
- RCM
- failures
- maintenance plans
- not patch twice
Sources for this job· O*NET 17-2112.00· ESCO/ISCO 2141