Automation index
How much of a Grill cook’s job can AI already do?
A doneness chart comes earlier. Marking on the grill and serving it at the point do not.
This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.
Task comparison
IS WORK OVER?
Grill cook
19%
AI can already do 19% of this job.
#492 / 653
View rankingGrill cook
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Cut, ageing and the requested doneness.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 32% | +5.1 |
Grill, mark and the fire that dies.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 22% | 8% | +1.8 |
Rest, plate and the one that goes cold.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
List, shrink and the expensive cut.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
The full room and not working too far ahead.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 18% | +2.9 |
At the point, and not drying the cut.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 14% | 12% | +1.7 |
| Total | 100% | 19% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- mark on the grill
- doneness
- ageing
- rest
- plate
- cuts
- grill shrink
- the fire
Sources for this job· O*NET 35-2014.00· ESCO/ISCO 5120
IS WORK OVER?
Clinical research associate
27%
#172 / 653
View rankingClinical research associate
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Protocol, CRF and the monitoring visit.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 48% | +8.6 |
Source, the gap and the one that does not fit.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Adverse event, the deadline and not delaying.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Consent, the signature and the one who did not understand.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
The sponsor, the audit and not dressing the figure.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
Audit, and not leaving a made-up figure.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 27% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- CRF
- monitoring
- adverse events
- informed consent
- source data
- trial audits
- clinical protocols
- site visits
Sources for this job· O*NET 11-9121.00· ESCO/ISCO 2131