Automation index
How much of a Grill cook’s job can AI already do?
A doneness chart comes earlier. Marking on the grill and serving it at the point do not.
This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.
Task comparison
IS WORK OVER?
Grill cook
19%
AI can already do 19% of this job.
#535 / 703
View rankingGrill cook
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Cut, ageing and the requested doneness.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 32% | +5.1 |
Grill, mark and the fire that dies.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 22% | 8% | +1.8 |
Rest, plate and the one that goes cold.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
List, shrink and the expensive cut.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
The full room and not working too far ahead.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 18% | +2.9 |
At the point, and not drying the cut.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 14% | 12% | +1.7 |
| Total | 100% | 19% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- mark on the grill
- doneness
- ageing
- rest
- plate
- cuts
- grill shrink
- the fire
Sources for this job· O*NET 35-2014.00· ESCO/ISCO 5120
IS WORK OVER?
Curriculum designer
27%
#157 / 703
View rankingCurriculum designer
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Sequence, criteria and the kit.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 48% | +8.6 |
Pilot classroom, the teacher and what will not fit.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Rubric, the marker and not inflating.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Review, inspection and not dressing it.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
The publisher, the deadline and not swallowing a cut.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
That it can be taught, and not dying in the PDF.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 27% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- teaching sequences
- criteria
- rubrics
- pilot classrooms
- curriculum kit
- inspection
- publishers
- dead PDF
Sources for this job· O*NET 25-9031.00· ESCO/ISCO 2351