Automation index
How much of a Grill cook’s job can AI already do?
A doneness chart comes earlier. Marking on the grill and serving it at the point do not.
This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.
Task comparison
IS WORK OVER?
Grill cook
19%
AI can already do 19% of this job.
#567 / 743
View rankingGrill cook
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Cut, ageing and the requested doneness.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 32% | +5.1 |
Grill, mark and the fire that dies.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 22% | 8% | +1.8 |
Rest, plate and the one that goes cold.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
List, shrink and the expensive cut.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
The full room and not working too far ahead.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 18% | +2.9 |
At the point, and not drying the cut.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 14% | 12% | +1.7 |
| Total | 100% | 19% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- mark on the grill
- doneness
- ageing
- rest
- plate
- cuts
- grill shrink
- the fire
Sources for this job· O*NET 35-2014.00· ESCO/ISCO 5120
IS WORK OVER?
Reliability engineer
27%
#176 / 743
View rankingReliability engineer
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Data, MTBF and the Pareto.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 48% | +8.6 |
Failure, the cause and not patching twice.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Spare, the critical and not hiding it.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
RCM, the plan and the one that is not done.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
Production, the rush and not running the tired one.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
That it does not drop at three, and not hiding the spare.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 27% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- MTBF
- Pareto
- root causes
- critical spares
- RCM
- failures
- maintenance plans
- not patch twice
Sources for this job· O*NET 17-2112.00· ESCO/ISCO 2141