Automation index
How much of a Secondary teacher’s job can AI already do?
A unit plan comes earlier. Them being quiet, working, and nobody left out, do not.
This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.
Task comparison
IS WORK OVER?
Secondary teacher
22%
AI can already do 22% of this job.
#444 / 743
View rankingSecondary teacher
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Unit, criteria and the exam.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Classroom, the group and the one who blows it up.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
Cover, the corridor and the fight.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
Family, the report and not giving a 5 for quiet.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Staff, inspection and not dressing it.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 18% | +3.2 |
That they work, and nobody left out.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 22% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- unit plans
- assessment criteria
- secondary cover
- corridors
- the report
- staff meeting
- schools inspection
- behaviour
Sources for this job· O*NET 25-2031.00· ESCO/ISCO 2330
IS WORK OVER?
Acoustics engineer
27%
#170 / 743
View rankingAcoustics engineer
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Reading, the map and the standard.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 48% | +8.6 |
Works, the insulation and what was not put in.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Simulation, the model and not trusting it alone.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Report, the neighbour and not softening the dB.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
The council, the licence and not dressing it.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
Bring it down for real, and not selling the miracle panel.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 27% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- noise maps
- insulation
- dB
- acoustic simulations
- standards
- licences
- neighbours
- field readings
Sources for this job· O*NET 17-2199.00· ESCO/ISCO 2149