Automation index
How much of a Secondary teacher’s job can AI already do?
A unit plan comes earlier. Them being quiet, working, and nobody left out, do not.
This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.
Task comparison
IS WORK OVER?
Secondary teacher
22%
AI can already do 22% of this job.
#444 / 743
View rankingSecondary teacher
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Unit, criteria and the exam.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Classroom, the group and the one who blows it up.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
Cover, the corridor and the fight.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
Family, the report and not giving a 5 for quiet.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Staff, inspection and not dressing it.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 18% | +3.2 |
That they work, and nobody left out.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 22% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- unit plans
- assessment criteria
- secondary cover
- corridors
- the report
- staff meeting
- schools inspection
- behaviour
Sources for this job· O*NET 25-2031.00· ESCO/ISCO 2330
IS WORK OVER?
Traffic engineer
27%
#179 / 743
View rankingTraffic engineer
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Counts, the model and the microsim.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 48% | +8.6 |
Junction, the timings and the pedestrian.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Works, the diversion and not choking the neighbourhood.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Report, the councillor and not painting the miracle lane.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
The crash, the figure and not hiding it.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
That the junction does not kill, and not painting extra.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 27% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- microsims
- counts
- junction timings
- pedestrians
- diversions
- councillors
- crashes
- lanes
Sources for this job· O*NET 17-2051.00· ESCO/ISCO 2142