Automation index
How much of a Tram driver’s job can AI already do?
Urban ATO comes earlier. Crossing pedestrians without clipping the badly parked car do not.
This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.
Task comparison
IS WORK OVER?
Tram driver
19%
AI can already do 19% of this job.
#502 / 653
View rankingTram driver
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Checks, log and the cab.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 32% | +5.1 |
Drive, stops and the pedestrian who steps out.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 24% | 8% | +1.9 |
Badly parked car, calls and Control.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Timetable, reliefs and rush hour.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
The tourist, the bike and not over-hooting.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 14% | 18% | +2.5 |
Hit nobody, and make the terminus.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 14% | 12% | +1.7 |
| Total | 100% | 19% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- drive trams
- urban stops
- pedestrians
- badly parked cars
- Control
- rush hour
- cab checks
- terminus
Sources for this job· O*NET 53-4041.00· ESCO/ISCO 8311
IS WORK OVER?
Pharmacovigilance officer
27%
#187 / 653
View rankingPharmacovigilance officer
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Case, the file and MedDRA.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 48% | +8.6 |
Seriousness, the link and the one that does not fit.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
File, the AEMPS deadline and not delaying.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Signal, the aggregate and not playing it down.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
The doctor, the ADR and not arguing the story.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
If it is serious, call it. And not staying quiet.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 27% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- ADR
- MedDRA
- AEMPS
- safety signals
- seriousness
- causality
- case files
- regulatory deadlines
Sources for this job· O*NET 29-1051.00· ESCO/ISCO 2262